An honest comparison with mainstream messengers

No clean-sweep table here. This puts Cinderous next to Signal, LINE and WhatsApp based on public information — including what we haven't finished yet. Find the row you care about.

DimensionCinderousSignalLINEWhatsApp
Phone number required to sign upNot required — your key is your identityRequired¹RequiredRequired
End-to-end encryption by default✓ All messages✓△ Texts & locations (Letter Sealing); not all content✓
Who can see who you talk to (metadata)Largely hidden — Gift Wrap ciphertext + one-time sendersPartially protected (sealed sender)Visible to the platformVisible to the platform, part of Meta
Open source✓ AGPL, clients + relay✓ Clients + server✗✗
Server architectureDecentralized multi-node; anyone can self-hostCentralizedCentralizedCentralized
Where your messages liveOnly on your device; offline queue is ciphertext with auto-expiryYour deviceServers / cloud backupDevice + optional cloud backup
Business modelOpen source + donations — no ads, transparent fundingNonprofit donationsAds & commerceMeta's business ecosystem
Platform can suspend your accountNo single platform canYesYesYes
Forward secrecyImplemented (experimental)✓Undisclosed✓
Feature maturityIn developmentMatureRichestMature

¹ Signal usernames can hide your number, but registration still requires one.

All trademarks and product names belong to their respective owners. Comparison based on public information (as of July 2026); official product documentation prevails where they differ. On the forward-secrecy row: ours is **implemented but has not been through an independent cryptography audit**, is off by default, and must be enabled manually; the products marked with a check have been through multiple external audits. These are not equivalent, which is why we do not use a check mark.

Evaluating for a company? See how Enterprise differs from common options →